• 3 2025 Super Bowl Ads That Got Us Talking: Tubi, Dunkin’, and Fetch

    3 2025 Super Bowl Ads That Got Us Talking: Tubi, Dunkin’, and Fetch

    Every year, brands pull out all the stops to make a splash. Some go for patriotic, some go for sentimental, while others go for absurdity. This year, three ads caught our attention and got us talking. Melody Curran (Brand Strategist) and Rory Nolan (Creative Copywriter) broke down the Tubi, Dunkin’, and Fetch commercials — analyzing what made them stick with us from both creative and strategic perspectives — and highlighted the importance of aligning strategy and creative toward a common campaign goal.

    1. Tubi: Weird, Wild and Western

    Ever heard of Tubi before this year’s Super Bowl? Yeah, us neither. But their ad made sure we’d remember the name. The spot featured a kid with a cowboy hat… that was part of his skull. Yep, you read that right.

    The ad leaned into the absurd while subtly playing on trends. Westerns were once America’s favorite genre, but fantasy has taken the crown in recent years. We have a hunch that Tubi cleverly (and creepily) used that data point  to showcase its broad selection of content. And it worked.

    We couldn’t stop talking about the underlying message: your media preferences are part of your identity. From Yellowstone-loving city slickers to fantasy fans sporting wizard hats, the ad reminded us that Tubi has something for everyone — no matter what genre speaks to you.

    The Verdict: Memorable, weird, and surprisingly insightful. We’ll be thinking about that cowboy hat for a while.

    2. Dunkin’: All Celebrities, No Substance

    Ah, Dunkin’ — the beloved Massachusetts staple. This year, the coffee giant went big with a celebrity-stuffed spectacle featuring Ben Affleck, Casey Affleck, Jeremy Strong, Bill Belichick, Bill Belichick’s girlfriend and more. It was loud, beyond colorful, and jam-packed with pop-culture references.

    The problem? It tried to do too much. Between the pop-culture nods, the over-the-top humor and the sheer number of stars crammed into 60 seconds, the core message got lost. We couldn’t help but wonder: What was the plan here?

    We get it — Dunkin’ doesn’t need to introduce itself. But this felt more like a flex than a clear, cohesive ad. The best part? A brief moment of real, relatable banter about Dunkin’ being for “real” people. If they’d leaned into that, maybe the ad would’ve hit harder.

    The Verdict: A classic case of “too much of a good thing.” Dunkin’, we love you, but next time, maybe skip the Dune references.

    3. Fetch: A Stunt That Missed the Mark

    Fetch took a big swing with a Super Bowl giveaway, promising $10,000 to 120 lucky viewers who participated through their app. The idea was solid: turn a passive ad experience into an interactive event (while hacking their big game ad-buy). But in execution? It fell flat.

    For starters, Fetch isn’t exactly a household name. The ad didn’t do enough to explain what the app actually does (it’s a rewards platform for everyday purchases, like groceries) ahead of encouraging downloads – a direct response strategy. Instead, viewers got a vague message and an arguably clunky process that required them to stay on the app for 10 minutes to participate in the giveaway. We’re curious how many of those that did download the app kept it on their phone and learned more about what Fetch Rewards does the other 364 days of the year.

    We admired the ambition, though. Fetch used its budget to give back to consumers instead of just paying celebrities — something you don’t see often enough. They also saw a huge lift in site traffic with a 803% spike on Feb. 9th, according to Similarweb. But without more brand awareness or clearer instructions, the stunt likely left many viewers scratching their heads and may lead to a drop off in traffic, app downloads post-event versus capturing long-term, loyal customers.

    The Verdict: A promising concept that needed more groundwork. Maybe next year, Fetch.

    Super Bowl ads are like halftime shows: some blow you away, some leave you baffled, and all of them get people talking. Tubi won the “weird but compelling” award, Dunkin’ went celebrity-overload, and Fetch tried to hack the system with mixed results.

    At the end of the day, these ads reminded us that creativity, strategy and clarity matter more than celebrity cameos or flashy stunts. And if you’re going to attach a cowboy hat to someone’s skull, well, you better have a solid story to back it up.

    What did you think of these ads? Did Tubi’s weirdness work for you? Did Dunkin’ make you laugh? And did you even know what Fetch was before the giveaway? Let us know!

  • A Deep Dive Into This Year’s Super Bowl Commercials

    A Deep Dive Into This Year’s Super Bowl Commercials

    Well, that stung. For a Patriots fan out of water living on the West Coast, Super Bowl LII was an emotional rollercoaster, culminating in championship derailment. Witnessing my hometown New England Patriots come within inches of a sixth league title was a natural cap on the well to my young, albeit fruitful, tenure as a Boston sports fan. But, I’m over it. I swear. Now on to the topic that really mattered on Sunday: The Commercials.

    Before diving into the analysis of the 72 spots by 27 advertisers, some interesting trends to highlight:

    • Cost / Running Time: Ads ran 30 seconds on average for a cool $5 million per spot — the highest ever. That means the big wigs at NBC, who hosted the big dance this year, ate up more than $50 million worth of Super Bowl spotlight for their five, minute-long Olympic previews. Ouch.
    • Hashtags: A dying breed? They certainly appear to be in Super Bowl advertising. A measly 6 percent of all spots used hashtags — a plummeting drop from the peak of 57 percent in 2014. Doritos and Mountain Dew took the hashtag charge, though, incorporating them throughout their joint ad. #WorthIt?
    • Call-backs: A big storyline in this year’s batch of ads was exactly that — the storyline. Advertisers used the copious in-game timeouts to their advantage, connecting multiple spots at different points of the game to create larger narratives. Tide took the reins in this department, with the four installations of its on-the-nose “It’s a Tide Ad” campaign. Tide won the day, with its mockery of the advertising form, by sending up other successful advertisers such as Mr. Clean and Old Spice.

    • Live Ads: There was a big, yet risky, push this year for commercials shot close to game time. Once again, Hyundai was successful in incorporating a live ad into the mix with “Hope Detector”, and playing a trick on some unaware Super Bowl patrons. Expect to see more of this in the future as advertisers devise creative ways to integrate their brand into an event.

    Beyond the major advertising trends in this year’s Super Bowl, here are some nuggets of observations about the 72 ads.

    • A whopping 83 percent of ads were related to the product or service of the brand. This means that a major portion of the ad was dedicated to what the company was selling, rather than a completely unrelated narrative followed by the company’s tagline at the outset. Of note, Dodge caught serious flak for its “Built to Serve” spot, sampling a Martin Luther King Jr. sermon and connecting the messaging to … buying trucks. Questionable title, questionable content.

    • 57 percent of the ads used humor to reach viewers, compared to 40 percent being serious or dramatic — an even distribution considering Super Bowl advertising’s reputation of doling out gut-busters like (typical) Tom Brady spirals.
    • 26 percent of ads we uplifting or inspirational. Advertisers like NBC fired up the Olympic engines with spots like “Good Odds”, while Toyota offered its “Mobility Anthem” to send an inspiring message to all types of movers.

    • Just 7 percent of ads used political or activist themes this year, a lull compared to last year’s Super Bowl, which was filled with political buzz. Matt Damon spoke for Stella Artois again this year, ending with a compelling call-to-action.

    Super Bowl LII thrilled viewers: the game was high-stakes, and advertisers, well, tried their best. While the New England Patriots ultimately met their demise, they gave us plenty of things to look forward to for their inevitable return to next year’s Super Bowl showdown.

    In preparation for this post, a brief content analysis was performed on the 72 spots from 27 advertisers, courtesy of the archives on SuperBowl-Ads.com. Ads were catalogued based on the company that released them, their names, how long they ran, and finally a list of stylistic themes in a “check all that apply” format.